Excerpt: What an irony: That the first credible journal in the chiropractic profession dealing with its relationship to philosophy finds its origins at The National College of Chiropractic. How could this be? After all, hasn't philosophy been one of the definers of our profession throughout its history? Perhaps even its cornerstone?
Hasn't the word “philosophy" even been written into many of our state laws (albeit that you can't legislate a person's philosophy, only the application of that philosophy, the practice)? And hasn't philosophy been debated by all sides when disputes concerning our function have arisen? Certainly the term is established in chiropractic, its use understood and accepted and its meaning crystal clear. Mustn't a journal published in 1991 be at least a secondary effort?
This excerpt is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Click on the above link for free full text.
The article is reprinted in the Journal of Chiropractic Humanities 2012; 19(1):36-39.