Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Sunday, May 31, 2020
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 6336
  Title A comparison of outcome measures for use with back pain patients: Results of a feasibility study
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8445356
Journal J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Feb;16(2):67-73
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Article
Abstract/Notes

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability, validity and change in patient clinical status over time with treatment for six potential outcome questionnaires in a defined population of patients.

SETTING: Physician based, multidoctor teaching practice.

PATIENTS: Three hundred thirty-five consecutive patients presenting with new complaints were solicited. One hundred eighty-six agreed to participate.

NTERVENTIONS: The six questionnaires being studied were administered to each of the participants on three separate occasions. They were: a) prior to clinical evaluation for their chief complaint, b) immediately after clinical evaluation and before treatment and c) 6 wk later.

MEASUREMENTS: Each instrument was scored following the prescribed methods of interpretation from the original literature describing it. Results were submitted for analysis by Pearson correlation and two-way analysis of variance as appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS: Differences were found in the mean value of the modified Zung with respect to both gender and time. An unexpected drop in patients' somatic perceptions in association with the process of clinical evaluation was found for the Modified Somatic Pain Questionnaire. Overall, the Oswestry and Visual Analogue Pain Scale were the most reliable and responsive to clinical change for musculoskeletal disorders.

CONCLUSIONS: This investigation demonstrated substantial differences in the validity and reliability of commonly referenced self-administered instruments for quantifying patient perceptions of pain and disability. The Oswestry and Visual Analogue Pain Scale were both more reliable and valid than other instruments.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; full text by subscription.


   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips