Buy Cialis From Canadian Pharmacy Bactroban 20 Mg Bula Viagra Buy Women Cialis Generico Capsule Gelatinoase Soft Tabs R Diltiazem Hcl Mg
Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Friday, October 18, 2019
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 6072
  Title Responsiveness of leg alignment changes associated with articular pressure testing to spinal manipulation: The use of a randomized clinical trial design to evaluate a diagnostic test with a dichotomous outcome
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8345313
Journal J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Jun;16(5):306-311
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract/Notes

OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to assess the stability of leg alignment reaction to a pressure challenge and its responsiveness to an adjustive intervention.

DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind clinical trial of a diagnostic test.

SETTING: Laboratory: Center for Technique Research.

PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two chiropractic college students, faculty and staff.

INTERVENTIONS: A high-velocity, low-amplitude, short lever adjustment of a single vertebra from among C1 and T3-T7; or a sham adjustment similar to a manual diagnostic pressure test at C1, T3-T7 or T9-T10.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Leg alignment reactivity: An increase in leg alignment discrepancy (yes or no) following a metered pressure challenge to a vertebra.

RESULTS: On average, stability was poor at T3-T7 (Kappa = 0.04), moderate at C1 (K = 0.47), and fair for sham pressure tests (K = 0.30). Responsiveness: The proportion of positive baseline leg alignment reactions that responded (became negative) to sham adjustment was 95% at T3-T7 and 55% at C1. Further analysis was untenable since too few vertebrae were implicated for an adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS: For the population investigated, the majority of the responsiveness of the leg alignment diagnostic test to a rotatory adjustment appears to be a diagnostic illusion (i.e., background noise unrelated to a treatment intervention). Further research with different subject populations, regions of investigation, leg alignment measurement techniques and vertebral challenge techniques are indicated.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Article only available in print.


 

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips