Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Thursday, July 2, 2020
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 2974
  Title Searching chiropractic literature: A comparison of three computerized databases
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8902663
Journal J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Oct;19(8):518-524
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Article
Abstract/Notes

PURPOSE: To determine the efficiency of three computerized bibliographic databases in retrieving literature relevant to the chiropractor.

METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used. English-language citations from 1990-92, on the topics of scoliosis, sciatica and neck pain, were searched in CHIROLARS, Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL) and MEDLINE. Citations were assessed for relevance criteria by two assessors; a third assessor was used when both were unsure of relevance. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of the relevance assessments was determined using the weighted Kappa statistic. The outcomes assessed were search time, search costs, number of citations, relevance, number of unique citations and the number of citations from refereed journals. Relative recall and cost per citation were used as primary measures of database efficiency.

RESULTS: A total of 846 citations were retrieved. After exclusions, 786 citations were assessed for relevance. Interexaminer reliability of the relevance assessments was moderate [K(w) (standard error) = 0.46 (0.03)]. Intra-examiner reliability was fair for each of the assessors [K(w) (SE) = .36 (.10) and .35 (.10), respectively]. Of the 385 relevant citations, CHIROLARS retrieved 88 (relative recall = 23%) at a cost of CAN$1.01 per relevant citation, ICL retrieved 37 (relative recall = 10%) at CAN$.65 per relevant citation, and MEDLINE retrieved 260 (relative recall = 68%) at CAN$.52 per relevant citation.

CONCLUSIONS: MEDLINE was found to be the most efficient database to search for literature relevant to the chiropractor; it retrieved the highest proportion of relevant citations and was the least expensive. CHIROLARS was the second most efficient of the three databases. No single database can function as a stand-alone source of information. For comprehensive searching, having an experienced reference librarian search MEDLINE in combination with at least one other database is recommended.  PubMed Record 

Author keywords: Abstracting and Indexing; Databases, Bibliographic; Chiropractic; Comparative Study; Medline

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Read the article.


 

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips