• Clohesy N
• Schneiders A
• Barbery G
• Obst S

• Affiliation / Central Queensland University. School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences. College of Health Sciences
• Affiliation / Griffith University. School of Applied Psychology
• Affiliation(G) / Australia / Queensland / Branyan
• Affiliation(G) / Australia / Queensland / South Brisbane
• Allied Health Personnel
• Back Pain / rehabilitation
• Back Pain / therapy
• Chiropractors / Australia
• General Practice
• Low Back Pain / rehabilitation
• Low Back Pain / therapy
• Open Access Document
• Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Background: Factors that influence utilisation rates of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for low back pain (LBP) within the chiropractic profession of Australia are currently unknown. This study aimed to examine whether factors, including age, sex, experience level, clinical title (principal vs associate), or a clinicians’ perceived value of PROMs, are predictive of the frequency and/or type of PROMs used by chiropractors in the management of LBP.

Methods: A cross sectional online survey was distributed to members of the Chiropractic Association of Australia (CAA now known as Australian Chiropractors Association-ACA) and Chiropractic Australia (CA). 3,014 CAA members and 930 CA members were invited to participate totaling 3,944, only respondents that were using PROMs were included in the analysis (n = 370). Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine associations between clinician demographics and perceived value of PROMs, and the frequency of pain, health, and functional patient reported outcome measure (PROM) usage by chiropractors.

Results: Principal chiropractors were more likely (Wald = 4.101, p = 0.04, OR = 1.4 (1.0–2.1)) than associate chiropractors to frequently use pain-related PROMs for the management of patients with LBP. The remaining demographic factors (age, sex, and experience level) were not associated with the frequency of PROM usage; nor were the perceived value clinicians place on PROMs in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Principal chiropractors were more likely to frequently use pain-related PROMs for the management of patients with LBP when compared to associate chiropractors. Demographic factors, appear to have little influence on PROM usage. While chiropractors place high value on PROMs, these beliefs are not associated with increased frequency of PROM usage for the management of LBP.

Author keywords: Outcome measures —  Rehabilitation —  Back pain —  Allied health —  Clinical practice

Author affiliations: NC, AS, SO: College of Health Sciences, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Branyan, Queensland, Australia; G: School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Corresponding author: Natalie Clohesy—natalie.clohesy@cqumail.com

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; click on the above link for free full text.  Online access only. PubMed Record | PDF