Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 25825
  Title Effect of active TENS versus de-tuned TENS on walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized controlled trial
URL https://chiromt.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12998-019-0245-z
Journal Chiropr & Manual Ther. 2019 ;27(24):Online access only 10 p
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract/Notes

Background context: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) leads to diminished blood flow to the spinal nerves causing neurogenic claudication and impaired walking ability. Animal studies have demonstrated increased blood flow to the spinal nerves and spinal cord with superficial para-spinal electrical stimulation of the skin.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of active para-spinal transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) compared to de-tuned TENS applied while walking, on improving walking ability in LSS.

Study design: This was a two-arm double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial.

Patient sample: We recruited 104 participants 50 years of age or older with neurogenic claudication, imaging confirmed LSS and limited walking ability.

Outcome measures: The primary measure was walking distance measured by the self-paced walking test (SPWT) and the primary outcome was the difference in proportions among participants in both groups who achieved at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using relative risk with 95% confidence intervals.

Methods: The active TENS group (n = 49) received para-spinal TENS from L3-S1 at a frequency of 65–100 Hz modulated over 3-s intervals with a pulse width of 100–200 usec, and turned on 2 min before the start and maintained during the SPWT. The de-tuned TENS group (n = 51) received similarly applied TENS for 30 s followed by ramping down to zero stimulus and turned off before the start and during the SPWT.

Study funded by The Arthritis Society ($365,000 CAN) and salary support for Carlo Ammendolia funded by the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation ($500,000 CAN over 5 years).

Results: From August 2014 to January 2016 a total of 640 potential participants were screened for eligibility; 106 were eligible and 104 were randomly allocated to active TENS or de-tuned TENS. Both groups showed significant improvement in walking distance but there was no significant difference between groups. The mean difference between active and de-tuned TENS groups was 46.9 m; 95% CI (− 118.4 to 212.1); P = 0.57. A total of 71% (35/49) of active TENS and 74% (38/51) of de-tuned TENS participants achieved at least 30% improvement in walking distance; relative risk (RR), 0.96; 95% CI, (0.7 to 1.2) P = 0.77.

Conclusions: Active TENS applied while walking is no better than de-tuned TENS for improving walking ability in patients with degenerative LSS and therefore should not be a recommended treatment in clinical practice.  Read the protocol for this trial.

Author keywords: Intermittent claudication — Lumbar spinal stenosis — Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) — Walking — Randomized controlled trial — Non-operative treatment

Author affiliations: CA, PC: Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; CA, AA: Rebecca MacDonald Centre for Arthritis & Autoimmune Disease, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; PC: Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; PC: UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Toronto, Ontario,  Canada; YRR: Department of Orthopedics, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; DS: Occupational and Industrial Orthopaedic Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; MS: Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CB, GH: Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; CB, GH: Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; BB: Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; click on the above link for free full text. PubMed Record


 

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips