Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 25674
  Title The efficacy of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review
URL https://journal.parker.edu/index.php/jcc/article/view/51
Journal J Contemp Chiropr. 2019 ;2():Online access only p 25-33
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Systematic Review
Abstract/Notes

Background: Instrument-Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is a common form of manual therapy involving rigid instruments of various shapes and materials to locate and treat soft tissue disorders. The therapeutic mechanism of IASTM is not clearly understood, but there is some evidence that the technique may support the breakdown and absorption of scar tissue, mobilization of fascia, and improved tissue healing. Currently, there are no systematic reviews that have specifically investigated the effects of IASTM on pain intensity of soft tissue disorders.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically appraise the current evidence assessing the effects of IASTM on pain intensity in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: A search of the literature was conducted during the Fall of 2017 which included the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus. The search terms included individual or a combination of the following: instrument; assisted; augmented; soft-tissue; mobilization; Graston; and technique.

Results: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials and 1 controlled clinical trial were included. The Graston technique was reported as being the specific technique utilized in all studies. Five of the 6 studies compared IASTM to a non-IASTM group. All 5 of these studies demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant (p<0.05) reduction in pain within the IASTM groups. Four of the 6 studies demonstrated a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference between groups.

Conclusion: The literature surrounding the efficacy of IASTM for musculoskeletal pain is evolving. Due to the paucity and heterogeneity of studies included, in addition to a lack of methodological consistency, it is difficult to make clinical recommendations with respect to optimal IASTM protocols. However, the results of this review indicate that most included studies of IASTM appears to demonstrate clinically meaningful change with respect to pain intensity for musculoskeletal conditions.

Author keywords: Soft Tissue; Rehabilitation; Physical Therapy

Author affiliations:  AK, AW: Resident of the Royal College of Chiropractic Sports Sciences (Canada); KS: Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Click on the above link for free full text. PDF version


 

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips