Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Sunday, November 28, 2021
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature

For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 23571
  Title Accuracy of clinical tests in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: A systematic review [review]
Journal Chiropr & Manual Ther. 2014 ;22(25):Online access only 19 p
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Review

Background: Numerous clinical tests are used in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury but their accuracy is unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy
of clinical tests for the diagnosis of ACL injury.

Methods: Study Design: Systematic review. The review protocol was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42012002069).Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL) were searched up to 19th of June 2013 to identify diagnostic studies comparing the accuracy of clinical tests for ACL injury to an acceptable reference standard (arthroscopy, arthrotomy, or MRI). Risk of bias was appraised using the QUADAS-2 checklist. Index test accuracy was evaluated using a descriptive analysis of paired likelihood ratios and displayed as forest plots.

Results: A total of 285 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 14 studies were
included in this review. Included studies were deemed to be clinically and statistically
heterogeneous, so a meta-analysis was not performed. Nine clinical tests from the history
(popping sound at time of injury, giving way, effusion, pain, ability to continue activity) and
four from physical examination (anterior draw test, Lachman’s test, prone Lachman’s test and
pivot shift test) were investigated for diagnostic accuracy. Inspection of positive and negative
likelihood ratios indicated that none of the individual tests provide useful diagnostic
information in a clinical setting. Most studies were at risk of bias and reported imprecise
estimates of diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion: Despite being widely used and accepted in clinical practice, the results of individual history items or physical tests do not meaningfully change the probability of ACL injury. In contrast
combinations of tests have higher diagnostic accuracy; however the most accurate
combination of clinical tests remains an area for future research.

Clinical relevance: Clinicians should be aware of the limitations associated with the use of clinical tests for diagnosis of ACL injury.

This abstract is reproduced with permission of the publisher. Click on the above link for free full text.


   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
Email To
HTML Text     Excel

To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips