Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 18772
  Title Applying structural equation modeling to Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board measures [platform presentation; the Association of Chiropractic Colleges' Thirteenth Annual Conference, 2006]
URL
Journal J Chiropr Educ. 2006 Spring;20(1):30-31
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Meeting Abstract
Abstract/Notes BACKGROUND: Since 1962, the Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board (CCEB) has been evaluating chiropractors desiring to practice in Canada. The examinations currently include the written examinations, the clinical skills examination, and a practitioner assessment examination. Structural equation modeling (SEM) combines models and methods from econometrics, psychometrics, sociometrics, and multivariate statistics. SEM is a theory rich approach to multivariate analysis, and focuses on hypothesis testing of a structural theory as it applies to some phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research project was to determine if SEM can be successfully applied to the CCEB measures to explore the inferential nature of the “causal” relationship between academic ability and success on the CCEB examinations, specifically the ability to make correct clinical decisions (diagnosis and management).

METHODS: Data were supplied by the Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board (CCEB) and consisted of anonymized data from 292 candidates for its March and June 2004 Clinical Skills Examinations. There were six data variables provided by the CCEB: standardized scores for the Basic Science, Applied Science, Clinical Decision Making and OSCE examinations. The last two variables were undergraduate grade-point average, and chiropractic college grade-point average. As this was a time-series study (undergraduate grade point average to licensure examination data), a latent variable path analysis was the SEM method of choice. The theoretical model proposed that: 1) a latent trait called Academic Ability had a causal relationship to another latent trait called Professional Knowledge, and 2) that the latent trait Professional Knowledge had a causal relationship to a third and final latent trait called Clinical Reasoning Ability. The model to data fit was analyzed with EQS version 6.1 (B83).

RESULTS: The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) for the model to data fit was 0.98. All but one path coefficient were higher than 0.40. From Academic Ability to Professional Knowledge, the path coefficient was 0.84. From Professional Knowledge to Clinical Reasoning Ability, the path coefficient was 0.88. The path coefficients from the observed variables reveal that the weakest path coefficient was between Applied Science and Clinical Reasoning Ability (0.24). The Clinical Decision Making variable had a much stronger path coefficient to Clinical Reasoning Ability (0.81).

DISCUSSION: A CFI of 0.98 indicates that there was a strong fit of the data to the theoretical model. The strong path coefficients between latent variables infer that: if chiropractors with strong Clinical Reasoning Ability are desired, then students should not move from the second year of their education unless they have demonstrated a substantial grasp of underlying concepts. Further, in order for students to be able to achieve a large measure of the latent trait Professional Knowledge, they should enter the chiropractic education process with a large measure of the latent trait Academic Ability. The weak path coefficient from Applied Science to Clinical Reasoning Ability infers that the 5-option short-format clinical vignette questions on the Applied Science examination are not as good a measure of the latent trait Clinical Reasoning Ability as is the 26-option long-format clinical vignettes from the Clinical Decision Making examination.

CONCLUSION: Structural Equation Modeling, in the form of a latent variable path analysis, can be successfully applied to data from the Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board. There is acceptable model to data fit, and inferences can be made from the data. These inferences include the need to recruit students with strong academic abilities, the need to hold back students who have not achieved a high level of understanding of the first two-years of work at chiropractic college, and that the extended-matching, long-format questions are a better estimate of clinical reasoning ability than 5-option short-format questions or the OSCE.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher.

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips