Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Tuesday, April 7, 2020
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:

ICL Home


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 18714
  Title Mathematical modeling of the so-called "Allis Test" [platform presentation; the Association of Chiropractic Colleges' Thirteenth Annual Conference, 2006]
URL
Journal J Chiropr Educ. 2006 Spring;20(1):8-9
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type Meeting Abstract
Abstract/Notes INTRODUCTION: In the chiropractic profession, the primary leg checking procedures that are done include a variety of both supine and prone procedures. Another method that is occasionally used is described as the "Allis test." The purpose of the present study is to perform mathematically modeling of this so-called Allis test, prior to undertaking a clinical investigation. Although the reliability of prone and supine leg checking procedures is reasonably well-known, and there are some studies on their validity, we are not aware of any investigations of the Allis protocol for determining leg length inequality. In our search for information on the Allis test, it became apparent that the test as it is commonly performed (described in the methods section below) might be more appropriately be called the Weber-Barstow test.

METHOD: For the purpose of mathematical modeling, we assumed a left tibial length of 470 mm, a left femoral length of 460 mm, and the distance between the hip and foot of the supine patient to be 570 mm. These numbers are based on a typical tibiofemoral ratio of 1 to 1.26 , and a knee angle of approximately 900. Since under these assumptions the femur, tibia, hip-foot distance create a triangle of known dimensions, it was possible to use trigonometry to calculate the angles of the triangle. From these angles, it was then possible to compute, for given changes in the length of the right leg bones, changes in the height and Y-axis position of the knee. We also explored the mathematical consequences of one hip being drawn up cephalad compared with other, while the feet are kept even at the foot of the table (thus increasing the hip-foot distance on one side).

RESULTS: The knee altitude is diminished with either femoral or tibial length reduction. The knee is shifted cephalad when the femur is reduced in length. Shortening of the femur has an approximately 25% greater impact on knee Y-axis location than tibial shortening, whereas tibial length reduction has an approximately 25% greater impact than femoral shortening on knee altitude.

DISCUSSION: Irrespective of nomenclature, our modeling shows that the traditional interpretation of the test may be flawed. Although it may detect a leg length inequality, the test does not appear to detect what some individuals have said. This study is limited by the fact that it is pure modeling, and it will take a clinical study to see if its predictions are borne out. The simple model we describe may not be an entirely appropriate representation of a flesh and blood leg, with the complexity of its joint kinematics. Future studies may address the interexaminer and intraexaminer of this type of visual check, and compare its results against an accepted gold standard for a leg length inequality, such as the scanogram x-ray.

There are significant discrepancies in the literature on the description of the Allis/Galleazzi test, which appears relevant only to infants, and is performed with the hip at 90°.The procedure chiropractors commonly perform closely resembles what Magee calls the Weber-Barstow procedure. The modeling we performed refutes what Magee and others have said on the interpretation of the test. Either a short tibia or femur lowers the knee seen from the foot of the table, by similar amounts, and cannot discriminate between a leg length inequality due to one or the other. In the side view, a short femur brings the knee cephalad, and a short tibia brings it caudad, by similar amounts.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher.

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips