Index to Chiropractic Literature
Index to Chiropractic Literature
My ICL     Sign In
Monday, July 26, 2021
Index to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic LiteratureIndex to Chiropractic Literature
Share:


For best results switch to Advanced Search.
Article Detail
Return to Search Results
ID 1750
  Title Responsiveness of pain scales: A comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9467094
Journal J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Jan;21(1):1-7
Author(s)
Subject(s)
Peer Review Yes
Publication Type
Abstract/Notes

OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of three pain scales.

DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective single cohort.

SETTING: Chiropractic college outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS: Seventy-nine new patients.

INTERVENTION: Treatment of painful complaint by senior student interns under supervision of clinical tutors.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the verbal rating scale (VRS) and the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS: Mean usual levels of pain were consistently higher than those of current pain. Asking patients to report their current pain levels showed the NRS to be the most responsive of the measures (effect size = 0.86) compared with the VAS (effect size = 0.77) and the VRS (effect size = 0.76). When asking patients to report on their usual level of pain, the responsiveness of all the pain scales was enhanced (effect size = 1.34, 1.34 and 1.12 for the NRS, VAS and VRS, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Given the relative ease of use and scoring of the 11-point NRS, and the obvious advantages of using responsive evaluative measures, this scale is recommended for pain intensity measurement in most types of outcome studies. Furthermore, asking patients to report their usual pain levels, rather than current levels, enhances the responsiveness of the measures and is a more representative perspective of their pain experience. The findings of this study have important implications for investigators who wish to select the most appropriate pain scale for use an outcome measure in treatment evaluative trials.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Article only available in print.


 

   Text (Citation) Tagged (Export) Excel
 
Email To
Subject
 Message
Format
HTML Text     Excel



To use this feature you must register a personal account in My ICL. Registration is free! In My ICL you can save your ICL searches in My Searches, and you can save search results in My Collections. Be sure to use the Held Citations feature to collect citations from an entire search session. Read more search tips.

Sign Into Existing My ICL Account    |    Register A New My ICL Account
Search Tips
  • Enclose phrases in "quotation marks".  Examples: "low back pain", "evidence-based"
  • Retrieve all forms of a word with an asterisk*, also called a wildcard or truncation.  Example: chiropract* retrieves chiropractic, chiropractor, chiropractors
  • Register an account in My ICL to save search histories (My Searches) and collections of records (My Collections)
Advanced Search Tips